Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Some sections of this Web require you to login. It will also get you some nice prizes. It's painless.

In the Photo Gallery

Home arrow play by play (music) arrow Arcade Fire | Neon Bible (Merge)
Arcade Fire | Neon Bible (Merge) Print E-mail
Written by Paul John Little   
Monday, 12 March 2007
Digg!

cd_arcade

Neon Bible is to the '00s what Radiohead's OK Computer was to the '90s. Quite simply, it captures the zeitgeist as only a few pieces of popular music have ever managed to do.

 

 

 

 

"Ask whatever challenges dead and thoughtless beliefs. Ask: When did we become human beings and stop being whatever it was we were before this? Ask: Having become human, what is it that we are now doing or creating that will transform us into whatever it is that we are slated to next become?

"Even if it means barking on street corners, that's what you have to do, each time baying louder than before. You must testify. There is no other choice."

—Douglas Coupland, Girlfriend in a Coma 

When Funeral, the debut album from Montreal's Arcade Fire, was released in the fall of 2004, it garnered instant and nearly unanimous acclaim, heralding the arrival a major new creative force in rock. A powerfully intoxicating blend of scrappy post-punk and nearly symphonic orchestral arrangements, Funeral presented a suite of songs rich in metaphor, a work that probed and explored the human condition as a new ice age enveloped the world, depriving it of light, heat, and ultimately even precious memories of the past. Against this rather audacious backdrop of postmodernism, the band presented a dizzying range of ideas concerned mostly with life and death, loss and love, freedom and hope. Most everybody who heard the record came away from the experience knowing at least one sure thing: these kids were shooting from the hip and playing from the heart.

Two and a half years later, the band have teamed with a number of engineers and producers, among them the legendary Bob Johnston (Blonde On Blonde, Songs from a Room, At Folsom Prison, et al), to deliver their eagerly awaited sophomore LP. In short, it's a staggering success. Neon Bible is to the '00s what Radiohead's OK Computer was to the '90s. Quite simply, it captures the zeitgeist as only a few pieces of popular music have ever managed to do.

While Funeral's nervous energy runs through much of Neon Bible, the new record feels more carefully considered than its predecessor, both lyrically and musically. A largely organic affair, it seems to have been built from the ground up around a sturdy framework of acoustic guitars, earthy basslines and intuitive string arrangements, moving the band's sound further out of the indie ghetto and closer to the gentrified heart and soul of rock ‘n' roll. That said, an obvious debt is owed such early '80s club staples as New Order and Talking Heads, both of which are recalled to varying degrees on such tracks as the spooky opening cut "Black Mirror," the bleating "The Well and the Lighthouse" and "Black Waves/Bad Vibrations," a revisitation of themes first explored on Funeral's "Haiti." The production is impeccable, with depth, color and nuance galore. There is no obnoxious peaking here, no melange of noises each engaged with the other in a competition for dominance, and it's almost depressing how refreshing this sounds in 2007.

As much as Funeral was about love and loss and life, the central thematic plank of Neon Bible is the increasingly suffocating monotony that threatens to remove the very concepts of individuality and personal identity from the cultural lexicon. There is a discomfiting, at times almost claustrophobic, sense of powerlessness at the heart of no fewer than all 11 of the record's songs, a feeling that something important in each of us has been lost, never to be found again. The album's cryptic lead single, "Black Mirror," finds its narrator waking from a nightmare and trotting to the ocean, offering the first of the album's many allusions to dark water and rising tides. He stands looking into the water, the moonless sky affording him no reflection. "I know the time is coming/ When all the words will lose their meaning," Butler sings, his voice awash in eerie backmasking effects, a perversely ascending piano melody lacing itself through the narrow spaces of the song's speedily strummed guitars. "Please show me something that isn't mine/ But mine is the only kind that I relate to." In this way, the song speaks to the homogeneity of the modern world, daring it to show us something new and relevant even as our ability to appreciate that which is different diminishes before our very eyes. The following track, uptempo rocker "Keep the Car Running," again finds Butler contemplating dreams, every night the same ones, "same old city with a different name/ There's a weight that's pressin' down, late at night I can hear the sound."

The title cut from Neon Bible is quite short with a running time of just over two minutes, but it is important if only for the fact that it introduces the listener to the album's brief fascination with religion. Can it be used as a balm to stave off the emptiness of the world? It seems doubtful, to hear Butler sing bitterly, "In the light of a golden calf/ Oh God, I just had to laugh." The song "Intervention," with its refrain of "Workin' for the church while your family dies," paints a similarly bleak picture. "You're still a soldier in your mind/ Though nothing's on the line," according to one verse, suggesting that religion is yet one more obstacle on the path to virtue and self-fulfillment, no different at the end of the day from any other hollow pursuit or needless distraction.

The album's theme of stifled personal ambition amid a world of conformity is given the reverse Big Bang treatment, crammed into its ninth track, "Windowsill," as if by some reality-altering science-magic. The verses, crooned against a backdrop of strummed acoustic guitar resting on an airy pillow of synths, find Butler defining himself using negatives, as in, "I don't want to hear the noises on TV/ I don't want the salesmen comin' after me," chasing each couplet with the mantralike statement, "I don't want to live in my father's house no more." The song takes a frustrated stand against the soft-headedness, rampant consumerism and junk culture that have increasingly come to define modern American society. "I don't want it faster, I don't want it free," Butler protests, "I don't want to show you what they've done to me." Like so many young men of his generation, he is embarrassed by the superficial legacy we have inherited. The song's chorus is an exalted sigh of R&B, albeit one with a tear in its eye, all strings, brass and cleverly stacked layers of backing vocals. "The tide is high, and it's risin' still/ I don't want to see it at my windowsill." Even the casual listener will notice that Butler offers no galvanizing statements, no possible solutions or alternatives to the intrusiveness by which he is so offended. He's at a loss. The following song, "(Antichrist Television Blues)" follows a similar path, its fever-pitch Springsteenian narrative offering glimpses of a desperate, god-fearing father's attempt to thrust his young daughter into the public eye; not for money, not for fame, but simply so that he can share her talent with the world. It's edgy stuff.

Following a slightly rearranged version of their live staple "No Cars Go," the Arcade Fire conclude their second consecutive tour de force with "My Body Is a Cage," a moody dirge with a ticktock beat on loan from Phil Collins's "In the Air Tonight" that encapsulates the album's themes and serves as a concluding paragraph of sorts. "I'm living in an age," Butler drawls, "that calls darkness light/ Though my language is dead, still the shapes fill my head." A choir of voices chant hymnlike over the song during its second refrain, then it explodes like a supernova during the third, gossamer trumpets quivering like gold-veined petals against a deafening blast of immense church organ. "My mind holds the key," Butler concludes, "Set my body free... set my body free... set my body free..." And then his voice stops, his earthly presence escaping with the sharply resonating organ as it cuts out suddenly and bounces briefly around the room. A+ | Paul John Little

RIYL: Bruce Springsteen's Darkness on the Edge of Town; Modest Mouse; Talking Heads' Remain in Light; feeling like you're not the only twentysomething in the world on a quest for personal fulfillment.





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Fark!Blogmarks!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Squidoo!BlogMemes!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments
Add NewSearch
X - X IP:70.245.235.39 | 2007-03-12 23:12:33
I don't really know why, and I'm sure it's not this author's fault, but while reading this review I just totally had a "dust in the wind" moment. Maybe it's because I've read five or six reviews of this CD, all of which seem exactly the same, or maybe it's because I'm sick of every artist being compared to Bruce Springsteen (even though in any other year that would seem like a reasonable comparison) or maybe because the world is getting so fucking large and media is getting so fucking cheap, that every asshole with an opinion offers theirs, but then somehow, strangely, it increasingly feels like their are actually less authentic opinions.

I'm just feeling like "Who the fuck is Win Butler to tell me about anything?" (Especially when duder is writing from the standpoint of a jaded American, although he is Canadian, it's more like "Muchmusic what have you done to me/Save My Soul/Set me free, eh?) and why do I give a shit about Robert Christgau's, David Fricke's, Rob Sheffield's, or...Paul John Little's opinion, even though they appear to be the same opinion.

Trite. The Arcade Fire are trite (even though Neon Bible is probably the best CD that will come out this year), this review is trite, and I am trite. It's not that we have nothing to say, it's just that everyone has already said it on a million blogs, books, and songs.

Ugh. There's just too much of everything. We've all become meaningless and replaceable. The Pink Mountaintops are every bit as good as the Arcade Fire. Cokemachineglow.com is just as good as pitchforkmedia.com, Kevin Pollock is every bit as balding, old, and kinda funny as Richard Jeni.

I need a razorblade. What's the point? Wow, this review really bummed me out. Don't take it personally.
Bob McMahon IP:128.206.230.50 | 2007-03-12 23:41:38
I feel you. Just keep in mind that you shouldn't let a review of an Arcade Fire album called "Neon Bible" depress you. I mean, I felt the same way about Funeral. I love the song "Crown of Love" from that album but at the same time it's just so overblown. You have to aim for the stars if you want to reach them though.

And yeah, who the fuck is Win Butler to tell us anything? A really good musician? Yeah, but that doesn't mean I don't care for his preaching. And "Neon Bible"? What a terrible, preachy title.

As far as this review goes, I'll have to listen to the full album a few times before I can really comment on it (I have a copy of Neon Bible, I've just been putting off listening). I will say that pitchfork's 9.7 review of Funeral makes it hard for me to take ANY praise this band gets seriously. It was so gratifying to see David Cross nail them on the pretentiousness of that review in his list for them. I think if you search his name on their site you can find it.

You know that Richard Jeni apparently just killed himself? Check www.imdb.com for more info.

I hope you don't do the same thing.
Paul John Little IP:24.226.10.98 | 2007-03-14 13:45:04
"I'm just feeling like 'Who the fuck is Win Butler to tell me about anything?'"

That's a valid opinion, certainly, but it leads down a pretty dark path. It's fine to question what an artist is saying in his or her work, but to deny them the right to self-expression seems more than a little fascistic to me. Nobody's forcing you to listen, even if the record might be the best of the year by your own admission, so if this is how you feel, I'd suggest simply tuning out.

"Especially when duder is writing from the standpoint of a jaded American, although he is Canadian, it's more like "Muchmusic what have you done to me/Save My Soul/Set me free, eh?"

Butler is actually a native of Austin, TX, where he was partly raised. He attended the prestigious Exeter Academy preperatory school in New Hampshire before moving to Montreal in 2000, where he attended classes at the predominantly English language Concordia University. Having experienced America from within and without, I'd say he's certainly earned the authority to react to those experiences in his art. And even if he hadn't, since when was the content of one's passport a determining factor in weighing one's right to offer an opinion? Free speech cuts both ways, you know.

Thanks for lumping me in with Fricke, by the way, even though his notice in praise of Neon Bible wasn't half as glowing as mine. In my opinion, he's the last great writer left at RS.
Paul John Little IP:24.226.10.98 | 2007-03-14 13:59:26
"I have a copy of Neon Bible, I've just been putting off listening). I will say that pitchfork's 9.7 review of Funeral makes it hard for me to take ANY praise this band gets seriously. It was so gratifying to see David Cross nail them on the pretentiousness of that review in his list for them."

Ah, come on, Bob. Arcade Fire isn't Pitchfork.

If there's one thing I'm finding myself increasingly agitated by in the realm of online music fandom, it's this strange softening of the borders separating art from criticism. There seems to be a growing movement of listeners who are all too eager to pin every notice ever written about a band to their coat, as if there were some sort of collusion between the music made by artists and the reception it ends up getting in the press. I gotta call "bullshit" on that. It's not the fault of bands like Arcade Fire and Clap Your Hands Say Yeah that their music racks up critical acclaim left and right. There's no collusion there, just as there's none among writers like Fricke and Stephen Deusner and myself, and it seems remarkably silly to hold artists responsible for the admiration they inspire in their listeners. I find it especially unfair to criticize a down-to-earth band like Arcade Fire for kind of perceived pretentiousness constructed by some of their fans.

My two cents, is all.
Bob McMahon - Let me clarify IP:128.206.230.50 | 2007-03-14 15:31:51
This doesn't mean I'm not going to listen to the album and I didn't mean to imply that that the praise is what's keeping me from listening to it. And I'd like to point out that I said it's hard for me to take the PRAISE of the band seriously, not their actual music seriously. I'm glad you loved the album and chances are I will too, I'm just plain sick of seeing critics love this band so much even if they deserve it. I'll admit that that reaction is completely irrational and meritless, but it's still the reaction I get.

I agree that there are pepole willing to write off bands because of positive reviews before giving them a chance. I used to feel the same way about not liking music if it got popular and I've grown up since then. That attitude is childish and is not the attitude I meant to convey.

And why would I have a copy of the album if I didn't like the group? Let it be said I LIKE THIS GROUP.

Lastly, I really think that a lot of their music is pretentious. I don't know the band personally so when I say they're pretentious, I mean their music and stage show (from what I've seen on Conan and SNL) . Mind you I don't think "pretentious" and "good" are mutually exclusive terms. If you disagree about whether they're pretentious or not, fine. That's just a matter of opinion.

In conclusion, I think that you're mostly arguing against a point that I didn't make.

My second pair of two cents (one more half assed post and I can trade it all in for a nickel!).
Bob McMahon - Actually, let me change one th IP:128.206.230.50 | 2007-03-14 17:34:34
Thinking about it now and being honest, I actually do feel that it's rational to be annoyed by the critical fawning a band gets, even if they deserve it. I don't let it affect my judgement of the group itself.

"Quite simply, it captures the zeitgeist as only a few pieces of popular music have ever managed to do."

I can think of few ways to praise an album higher. If you're not sick of me by then, I'll let you know after enough listens whether I agree with that statement. Based on the songs that I have heard and how I feel about them, I doubt these high expectations are going to be met. I'm glad that you like it that much though.
Anonymous - Collusion IP:70.249.219.196 | 2007-03-14 23:44:48
It's not that anyone is making a case that intentional or unintentional collusion is going on between the critics and the band BUT all art is judged not only on it's own merits but also on the larger cultural phenomenon which it creates. Sure, it's not a band's fault that critics praise them and fans react to them but that never matters.
X IP:70.249.219.196 | 2007-03-15 00:17:09
I didn't mean to come off as fascist. There is nothing about the album or the lyrics that I disagree with, he's just saying nothing new but emoting like it's epiphany. Which is fine, whatever.

The MTV lyric I found strange believing that he was Canadian but when I first heard it, I simply thought it was a bizarre anachronism. MTV hasn't been relevent for years; I can't believe that it has "done" anything to Win. It sounds like something that would make more sense in the '80's.

I'm not hatin', although from your perspective I don't see how you could take it any other way. I just find the whole thing strange. The whole ultra-modern art world. For instance, your review has probably been primarily read by people like myself, who own the CD, have an opinion about it, and have read other reviews of it. Although the logical target audience for a review would be those who haven't heard the CD and have little knowledge of it. Unfortunately, those people don't care. They don't read music reviews. Few people do (although this "few" is still likely millions, it's a tiny, and probably already knowledgeable segment of society).

I guess I'm just jaded. I don't wanna work in a building downtown either but something tells me I should be so lucky.

It's not your fault or Win's fault that I feel this way (and I only mention how I feel because I believe it is somewhat pervasive). I mean I'm liberal and I used to be bright eyed and subscribe to Mother Jones and the Nation and hope that the war would end and that the middle class would stay strong, and that we could do something about global warming. Eventually, you get tired of talking about. Nothing changes, and listening to strong opinions about things you feel strongly about no longer influence you they just serve to remind you of how empty they are and how slow and fleeting real change is.

I guess I've just heard it all before and the fact that the Arcade Fire's sense of gloom seems so urgent here feels a little awkward. Like "What am I supposed to do with this?" I've gone full circle to the point that singing gleefully about a sunny day seems way more profound to me then pondering the meaning of life in a dying world.
X - Tuning Out IP:70.249.219.196 | 2007-03-15 00:26:37
Oh yeah, there's no way I'm tuning out. It's a wonderful album and despite what I've written, which I still hold firmly to, my one sentence review is: "Fucking brilliant, the best album of the year."
Bob - So after all this brouhaha IP:69.151.15.127 | 2007-04-28 21:51:53
I let the album sink in. Pretty amazing, maybe not A+ amazing, but I'm glad I bought the record.

Good to know that Paul John Little can write well too.

I'm still waiting on the Arcade Fire side project Neon Bible Funeral to come out. It sounds like a blast (and yes that was horrible satire).
Only registered users can write comments!

 
Sponsor Pod3
Schlafly
legal advice
red gorilla
Ardent Studios
BBH